<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 853 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209425</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified as the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to accept the gifts was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue. The tribunal reinstated the assessment orders accepting the gifts, emphasizing that disagreement alone does not render an AO&#039;s decision erroneous if it is based on a permissible view under the law. The appeals were allowed, and the revisional order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 853 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209425</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was unjustified as the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to accept the gifts was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue. The tribunal reinstated the assessment orders accepting the gifts, emphasizing that disagreement alone does not render an AO&#039;s decision erroneous if it is based on a permissible view under the law. The appeals were allowed, and the revisional order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>