<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 852 - ITAT, RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as there was no clear establishment of the charge of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalties were directed to be deleted for each of the years under consideration, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 852 - ITAT, RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as there was no clear establishment of the charge of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalties were directed to be deleted for each of the years under consideration, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>