<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1121 - ITAT, JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the learned CIT(A) that the disallowance of interest expenses under section 154 of the IT Act was not suitable for rectification as the issue was highly debatable and not a clear mistake. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the deletion of disallowance was dismissed, affirming the decision to delete the addition of interest expenses made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1121 - ITAT, JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the learned CIT(A) that the disallowance of interest expenses under section 154 of the IT Act was not suitable for rectification as the issue was highly debatable and not a clear mistake. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the deletion of disallowance was dismissed, affirming the decision to delete the addition of interest expenses made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>