<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 621 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209411</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross-objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed. The Commissioner&#039;s decisions regarding the issues of unexplained cash credits, bogus purchases, and commission payments were upheld based on the evidence provided. The judgment emphasized the importance of supporting evidence in business transactions, leading to the affirmation of the Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 621 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209411</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross-objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed. The Commissioner&#039;s decisions regarding the issues of unexplained cash credits, bogus purchases, and commission payments were upheld based on the evidence provided. The judgment emphasized the importance of supporting evidence in business transactions, leading to the affirmation of the Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>