<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1106 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209388</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the classification of loss as business or capital loss for a Hindu Undivided Family. The court ruled that penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as there was no deliberate mistake or concealment of income by the assessee. The court emphasized the lack of mens rea for concealment and dismissed the appeal, stating that the mere difference in loss classification did not warrant penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1106 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209388</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the classification of loss as business or capital loss for a Hindu Undivided Family. The court ruled that penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were not justified as there was no deliberate mistake or concealment of income by the assessee. The court emphasized the lack of mens rea for concealment and dismissed the appeal, stating that the mere difference in loss classification did not warrant penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>