<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 858 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to initiate reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act for the assessment year 2000-01 was upheld by the Court. The reassessment was based on new material, including financial documents not previously disclosed, supporting the belief that income had escaped assessment. The Court emphasized the necessity of a valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; for reopening assessments and rejected arguments against initiating reassessment based on disclosed material. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that no substantial legal question arose, and validating the reassessment under relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 858 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to initiate reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act for the assessment year 2000-01 was upheld by the Court. The reassessment was based on new material, including financial documents not previously disclosed, supporting the belief that income had escaped assessment. The Court emphasized the necessity of a valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; for reopening assessments and rejected arguments against initiating reassessment based on disclosed material. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that no substantial legal question arose, and validating the reassessment under relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>