<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 855 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209379</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the compensation received did not qualify for the deduction under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act as it did not meet the criteria of income derived from export activities. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, overturning the decision of the lower authorities and denying the deduction on the compensation received by the assessee from M/s Pepsico India Holding (P) Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 855 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209379</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the compensation received did not qualify for the deduction under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act as it did not meet the criteria of income derived from export activities. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, overturning the decision of the lower authorities and denying the deduction on the compensation received by the assessee from M/s Pepsico India Holding (P) Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>