<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 849 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to improper service of notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the mandatory procedures for service were not followed, as the correct addresses were not used despite being available on record. The participation of the assessee in subsequent proceedings did not cure the defect of non-service of notice under section 148, leading to the conclusion that the entire reassessment proceedings were void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 849 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to improper service of notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the mandatory procedures for service were not followed, as the correct addresses were not used despite being available on record. The participation of the assessee in subsequent proceedings did not cure the defect of non-service of notice under section 148, leading to the conclusion that the entire reassessment proceedings were void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>