<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 807 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209366</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and the CIT(A) regarding the validity of writing off bad debts and the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was held that the assessee&#039;s claim of bad debts written off was justified, and the penalty was rightly set aside as there was no intention to evade tax. The Court emphasized the significance of bonafide intentions in claiming deductions and ruled that no substantial question of law arose in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 807 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209366</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and the CIT(A) regarding the validity of writing off bad debts and the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was held that the assessee&#039;s claim of bad debts written off was justified, and the penalty was rightly set aside as there was no intention to evade tax. The Court emphasized the significance of bonafide intentions in claiming deductions and ruled that no substantial question of law arose in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>