<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 953 - Himachal Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209336</link>
    <description>The court upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the disallowance under Section 40-A (3). It was determined that adding back cash payments after rejecting books of accounts would result in quantifying income twice, leading to the appeal being allowed with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 953 - Himachal Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209336</link>
      <description>The court upheld the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the disallowance under Section 40-A (3). It was determined that adding back cash payments after rejecting books of accounts would result in quantifying income twice, leading to the appeal being allowed with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>