<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 951 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209334</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Settlement Commission&#039;s order was dismissed as they failed to substantiate over-valuation charges. The court found no legal question and deemed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, based on the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order implicitly accepted by the Revenue, appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 951 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209334</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Settlement Commission&#039;s order was dismissed as they failed to substantiate over-valuation charges. The court found no legal question and deemed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, based on the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order implicitly accepted by the Revenue, appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>