<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 949 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209331</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the Commissioner can act under section 263 if the assessing officer&#039;s order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Regarding the applicability of the proviso to section 14 A of the Income Tax Act, the High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration, noting the Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider the impact of the proviso. The Court affirmed that the proviso did not apply to the assessees&#039; case for the assessment year 1995-96, as it was inserted with retrospective effect from 11.5.2001.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 949 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209331</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the Commissioner can act under section 263 if the assessing officer&#039;s order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Regarding the applicability of the proviso to section 14 A of the Income Tax Act, the High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration, noting the Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider the impact of the proviso. The Court affirmed that the proviso did not apply to the assessees&#039; case for the assessment year 1995-96, as it was inserted with retrospective effect from 11.5.2001.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>