<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 915 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209322</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the deletion of remunerations paid to trustees, allowed the full claim of foreign travel expenses, maintained the charging of interest under section 234B, and allowed the appeal on the charging of interest under section 234D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 915 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209322</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the deletion of remunerations paid to trustees, allowed the full claim of foreign travel expenses, maintained the charging of interest under section 234B, and allowed the appeal on the charging of interest under section 234D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>