<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 914 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the revenue and cross objections filed by the assessee. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowing the foreign exchange loss claim, disallowance of business promotion expenses, and addition made under Section 92CA. However, it remitted the issue of the addition under Section 92CA back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of stock written off.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 914 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the revenue and cross objections filed by the assessee. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowing the foreign exchange loss claim, disallowance of business promotion expenses, and addition made under Section 92CA. However, it remitted the issue of the addition under Section 92CA back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration and ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of stock written off.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>