<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1097 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209319</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition in part, keeping the impugned order in abeyance. The petitioner was granted the liberty to file a civil suit to establish its rights over the property, with directions to maintain the status quo until the petitioner&#039;s rights are determined by a competent court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1097 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209319</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition in part, keeping the impugned order in abeyance. The petitioner was granted the liberty to file a civil suit to establish its rights over the property, with directions to maintain the status quo until the petitioner&#039;s rights are determined by a competent court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>