<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 943 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a tax dispute regarding commission paid to a foreign service provider between 9.7.2004 to 10.1.2006. The Tribunal held that as there was no specific provision for taxing such commission during that period, the Revenue could not impose service tax. Citing legal precedents and lack of evidence from the Revenue, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and granted any consequential relief permissible under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 943 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a tax dispute regarding commission paid to a foreign service provider between 9.7.2004 to 10.1.2006. The Tribunal held that as there was no specific provision for taxing such commission during that period, the Revenue could not impose service tax. Citing legal precedents and lack of evidence from the Revenue, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and granted any consequential relief permissible under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>