<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1038 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209312</link>
    <description>The U.P. Jal Nigam was treated as a local authority for section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, applying the unamended provision for assessment year 1980-81. The Court applied the R. C. Jain criteria and found that the Nigam&#039;s separate corporate status, independent rights and liabilities, statutory transfer of municipal water-supply and sewerage functions, deemed local fund, fee-levying powers, and control over water-supply and sewerage arrangements gave it the attributes of a local authority. On that basis, the income was exempt for the relevant year, and the contrary authority concerning the U.P. Forest Corporation was distinguished on facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1038 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209312</link>
      <description>The U.P. Jal Nigam was treated as a local authority for section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, applying the unamended provision for assessment year 1980-81. The Court applied the R. C. Jain criteria and found that the Nigam&#039;s separate corporate status, independent rights and liabilities, statutory transfer of municipal water-supply and sewerage functions, deemed local fund, fee-levying powers, and control over water-supply and sewerage arrangements gave it the attributes of a local authority. On that basis, the income was exempt for the relevant year, and the contrary authority concerning the U.P. Forest Corporation was distinguished on facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>