<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 741 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209306</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 27,31,200 as unexplained investment in property during the block assessment period. The Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition lacked a legal basis as it was not supported by material discovered during the search, emphasizing that such additions should stem from disclosed material. Therefore, the deletion of the addition was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 741 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209306</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 27,31,200 as unexplained investment in property during the block assessment period. The Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition lacked a legal basis as it was not supported by material discovered during the search, emphasizing that such additions should stem from disclosed material. Therefore, the deletion of the addition was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>