<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1232 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209304</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant, a cooperative society, was denied deductions under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Act for interest received from members and income from investments as working capital advances. The Court ruled that the appellant&#039;s credit facility to members was ancillary to its main objective, not constituting a separate banking service for section 80P(2)(a)(i) benefits. Additionally, the Court affirmed the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for interest on advances, subject to net income deductions. The appeal was dismissed, finding no fault with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1232 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209304</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant, a cooperative society, was denied deductions under sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) of the Act for interest received from members and income from investments as working capital advances. The Court ruled that the appellant&#039;s credit facility to members was ancillary to its main objective, not constituting a separate banking service for section 80P(2)(a)(i) benefits. Additionally, the Court affirmed the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for interest on advances, subject to net income deductions. The appeal was dismissed, finding no fault with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>