<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1230 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209296</link>
    <description>Dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was held not to justify final disposal where the first appellate authority had not examined the dispute on merits. The matter was restored for fresh adjudication before the Commissioner (Appeals) after compliance with a 50% pre-deposit requirement, ensuring de novo consideration of the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1230 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209296</link>
      <description>Dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was held not to justify final disposal where the first appellate authority had not examined the dispute on merits. The matter was restored for fresh adjudication before the Commissioner (Appeals) after compliance with a 50% pre-deposit requirement, ensuring de novo consideration of the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>