<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 776 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209292</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the IPRS incentive did not accrue in the assessment year 1993-94 and was not taxable for that year. The Court held that the income accrued in the subsequent year when the claim was quantified and approved, following the mercantile system of accounting. The Court found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order, stating that the IPRS incentive was not taxable for the year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 776 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209292</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the IPRS incentive did not accrue in the assessment year 1993-94 and was not taxable for that year. The Court held that the income accrued in the subsequent year when the claim was quantified and approved, following the mercantile system of accounting. The Court found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order, stating that the IPRS incentive was not taxable for the year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>