<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209285</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the impugned order, which confirmed the demand, imposed a penalty, and directed payment of interest on the confirmed amount for the reversal of CENVAT credit on input and input services utilized for manufacturing dutiable and exempted goods, was set aside. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner for issuing an appropriate order accepting the details provided by the appellant regarding reversal and interest due to a retrospective amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209285</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the impugned order, which confirmed the demand, imposed a penalty, and directed payment of interest on the confirmed amount for the reversal of CENVAT credit on input and input services utilized for manufacturing dutiable and exempted goods, was set aside. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner for issuing an appropriate order accepting the details provided by the appellant regarding reversal and interest due to a retrospective amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>