<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1204 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, granting abatement to the Gutkha manufacturer for non-production periods in 2008. The closure, spanning across months, met the 15-day criterion under Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008, entitling the assessee to abatement. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and accurate application of rules in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1204 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, granting abatement to the Gutkha manufacturer for non-production periods in 2008. The closure, spanning across months, met the 15-day criterion under Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, 2008, entitling the assessee to abatement. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and accurate application of rules in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>