<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 836 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209250</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT concluded that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, stating that the fabrication charges on job-work amounted to manufacturing, and the insurance claim did not result in real income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the assessment order not being flawed, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 836 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209250</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT concluded that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, stating that the fabrication charges on job-work amounted to manufacturing, and the insurance claim did not result in real income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the assessment order not being flawed, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>