<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1189 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209246</link>
    <description>A procedural public notice on bench allocation was held not to retrospectively undo appeals already filed and transferred under the earlier procedure. Because both appeals were already before the same bench, and an earlier contrary bench view created a jurisdictional inconsistency, the records were directed to be placed before the President for resolution before hearing. The order concerns only forum allocation and does not address the merits of the customs appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1189 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209246</link>
      <description>A procedural public notice on bench allocation was held not to retrospectively undo appeals already filed and transferred under the earlier procedure. Because both appeals were already before the same bench, and an earlier contrary bench view created a jurisdictional inconsistency, the records were directed to be placed before the President for resolution before hearing. The order concerns only forum allocation and does not address the merits of the customs appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>