<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed demands for duty within the normal period of limitation, rejecting the appellants&#039; argument of limitation barring specific demands. Penalties were not imposed due to lack of fraud or suppression of facts. The Tribunal excluded the period of stay by the High Court to re-quantify demands. No penalties were warranted as there was no intent to evade duties. The case was remanded for re-quantification of demands within the normal period, with interest payable for delayed payment. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed demands for duty within the normal period of limitation, rejecting the appellants&#039; argument of limitation barring specific demands. Penalties were not imposed due to lack of fraud or suppression of facts. The Tribunal excluded the period of stay by the High Court to re-quantify demands. No penalties were warranted as there was no intent to evade duties. The case was remanded for re-quantification of demands within the normal period, with interest payable for delayed payment. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>