<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1185 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, directing the lower appellate authority to review the case in light of the Board&#039;s clarification on refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The decision emphasizes that unutilized credits can be refunded against exports, subject to conditions, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in refund claim adjudications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1185 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, directing the lower appellate authority to review the case in light of the Board&#039;s clarification on refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The decision emphasizes that unutilized credits can be refunded against exports, subject to conditions, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in refund claim adjudications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>