<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1184 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the appellants to collect necessary documents and have a fair opportunity for cross-examination of witnesses. The adjudicating authority was instructed to pass an appropriate order after allowing the appellants to present their case adequately, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1184 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the appellants to collect necessary documents and have a fair opportunity for cross-examination of witnesses. The adjudicating authority was instructed to pass an appropriate order after allowing the appellants to present their case adequately, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>