<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1089 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling that an appeal under Section 35E(2) of the Central Excise Act can only be filed by an authority in the rank of the officer issuing the adjudication order. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to judicial discipline and precedent, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal filed by an Assistant Commissioner instead of the Deputy Commissioner who passed the adjudication order. Citing High Court decisions, the Tribunal held that appeals must be filed by the adjudicating authority, not another officer. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1089 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling that an appeal under Section 35E(2) of the Central Excise Act can only be filed by an authority in the rank of the officer issuing the adjudication order. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to judicial discipline and precedent, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal filed by an Assistant Commissioner instead of the Deputy Commissioner who passed the adjudication order. Citing High Court decisions, the Tribunal held that appeals must be filed by the adjudicating authority, not another officer. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>