<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1079 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209218</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied when duty-paid inputs were received in the factory and their receipt, manufacturer-issued invoice, and use were undisputed, even though the original invoice was lost in transit and only a xerox copy was produced. The Tribunal treated Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as not requiring rigid insistence on the original document where substantive entitlement was established and an FIR had been lodged for the loss. On that basis, the denial was set aside and the credit claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1079 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209218</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied when duty-paid inputs were received in the factory and their receipt, manufacturer-issued invoice, and use were undisputed, even though the original invoice was lost in transit and only a xerox copy was produced. The Tribunal treated Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as not requiring rigid insistence on the original document where substantive entitlement was established and an FIR had been lodged for the loss. On that basis, the denial was set aside and the credit claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>