<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1059 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present their case. The case highlighted the need for a consistent and reasoned decision-making process in handling refund claims under the Central Excise Act and the Finance Act, 1994, underscoring the significance of procedural fairness and clarity in resolving disputes related to service tax liabilities and refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1059 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present their case. The case highlighted the need for a consistent and reasoned decision-making process in handling refund claims under the Central Excise Act and the Finance Act, 1994, underscoring the significance of procedural fairness and clarity in resolving disputes related to service tax liabilities and refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>