<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1055 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209192</link>
    <description>The tribunal affirmed the undervaluation finding by M/s. IOL Broadcast Ltd., holding the Customs House Agent (CHA) accountable for failing to verify correct valuation details before filing the entry. The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) but reduced the amount to Rs. 5,000 in each case due to procedural errors by the CHA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1055 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209192</link>
      <description>The tribunal affirmed the undervaluation finding by M/s. IOL Broadcast Ltd., holding the Customs House Agent (CHA) accountable for failing to verify correct valuation details before filing the entry. The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) but reduced the amount to Rs. 5,000 in each case due to procedural errors by the CHA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>