<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1054 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209191</link>
    <description>The revised interest rate notified under Notification No. 75/2003-Cus. did not apply retrospectively to a refund claim for an earlier period. Interest on the sanctioned refund had to be computed period-wise according to the notifications in force during each relevant span. The assessee was entitled to 15% per annum from 1.5.2001 to 10.5.2001, 9% per annum from 11.5.2001 to 11.9.2003, and thereafter at the rate prescribed under Notification No. 75/2003-Cus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1054 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209191</link>
      <description>The revised interest rate notified under Notification No. 75/2003-Cus. did not apply retrospectively to a refund claim for an earlier period. Interest on the sanctioned refund had to be computed period-wise according to the notifications in force during each relevant span. The assessee was entitled to 15% per annum from 1.5.2001 to 10.5.2001, 9% per annum from 11.5.2001 to 11.9.2003, and thereafter at the rate prescribed under Notification No. 75/2003-Cus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>