https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209190 A DEPB verification claim was required to be supported by specific declarations in the shipping bills, including the composite product description, total net weight, constituent items attracting DEPB with their DEPB numbers and credit rates, and items not attracting DEPB with their combined weight. As the shipping bills omitted these particulars, the prescribed condition was not met. The rejection of the DEPB claim was therefore justified, and the appellate order upholding that rejection was sustained. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209190 A DEPB verification claim was required to be supported by specific declarations in the shipping bills, including the composite product description, total net weight, constituent items attracting DEPB with their DEPB numbers and credit rates, and items not attracting DEPB with their combined weight. As the shipping bills omitted these particulars, the prescribed condition was not met. The rejection of the DEPB claim was therefore justified, and the appellate order upholding that rejection was sustained. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209190