https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209187 Interference was unwarranted with the Commissioner (Appeals)' remand for reconsideration of valuation under the Central Excise Valuation Rules, because the appellate order had not finally determined the assessable value or duty demand. The matter was to be examined afresh by the adjudicating authority on the appropriate alternative valuation method, in line with the directions already issued. At that stage, there was no useful purpose in entering into the merits of the valuation dispute, and the fresh decision had to be taken after observing the principles of natural justice. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2013 01:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209187 Interference was unwarranted with the Commissioner (Appeals)' remand for reconsideration of valuation under the Central Excise Valuation Rules, because the appellate order had not finally determined the assessable value or duty demand. The matter was to be examined afresh by the adjudicating authority on the appropriate alternative valuation method, in line with the directions already issued. At that stage, there was no useful purpose in entering into the merits of the valuation dispute, and the fresh decision had to be taken after observing the principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209187