<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1021 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209179</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application and subsequently dismissed the appeal as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s reasons of &#039;depression&#039; and &#039;family problems&#039; were deemed insufficient to justify the significant delay in filing the appeal. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines in legal proceedings, noting that ignorance of the requirement to file a separate appeal was not a valid excuse for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1021 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209179</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application and subsequently dismissed the appeal as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s reasons of &#039;depression&#039; and &#039;family problems&#039; were deemed insufficient to justify the significant delay in filing the appeal. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines in legal proceedings, noting that ignorance of the requirement to file a separate appeal was not a valid excuse for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>