https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209175 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods seized from the vehicle but set aside the confiscation of work-in-progress goods from the factory. The penalty on the Director was revoked due to insufficient evidence of his direct involvement. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the penalty amount and redemption fine for the seized goods, emphasizing the need for documents to establish clearance of certain barrels. The case was remanded for further consideration with a fair hearing opportunity for the appellant. en-us Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2015 17:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209175 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods seized from the vehicle but set aside the confiscation of work-in-progress goods from the factory. The penalty on the Director was revoked due to insufficient evidence of his direct involvement. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the penalty amount and redemption fine for the seized goods, emphasizing the need for documents to establish clearance of certain barrels. The case was remanded for further consideration with a fair hearing opportunity for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209175