<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 995 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling that freight charges separately shown in invoices to buyers should be excluded from the assessable value of goods sold. This decision was based on precedent and interpretation of relevant rules and circulars, following earlier cases involving the same assessee. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 995 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling that freight charges separately shown in invoices to buyers should be excluded from the assessable value of goods sold. This decision was based on precedent and interpretation of relevant rules and circulars, following earlier cases involving the same assessee. The appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>