<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 991 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, ruling that two manufacturing units of a company should be considered separate factories for exemption under Notification No.3/2001. Despite being located on the same land and sharing management, the units had distinct registrations, machinery, and product lines, meeting the criteria established in prior case law. The decision emphasized the importance of fulfilling registration and production conditions to qualify for exemptions under relevant notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 991 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, ruling that two manufacturing units of a company should be considered separate factories for exemption under Notification No.3/2001. Despite being located on the same land and sharing management, the units had distinct registrations, machinery, and product lines, meeting the criteria established in prior case law. The decision emphasized the importance of fulfilling registration and production conditions to qualify for exemptions under relevant notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>