https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209147 The appeal was partly allowed, confirming a duty demand of Rs. 54,480 while setting aside the penalty and interest. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to issue a fresh speaking order considering the documents and case laws presented by the Revenue. The decision to uphold the duty demand for clandestine removal and impose penalty and interest under relevant sections of the Central Excise Act was deemed appropriate, despite discrepancies in the Commissioner's initial ruling. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209147 The appeal was partly allowed, confirming a duty demand of Rs. 54,480 while setting aside the penalty and interest. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to issue a fresh speaking order considering the documents and case laws presented by the Revenue. The decision to uphold the duty demand for clandestine removal and impose penalty and interest under relevant sections of the Central Excise Act was deemed appropriate, despite discrepancies in the Commissioner's initial ruling. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209147