<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1136 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner(Appeals) order and reinstating the original authority&#039;s decision of May 2005, denying the payment of interest on the pre-deposit. The Tribunal emphasized that no formal application for refund was made under Section 11B, and the submissions by the Respondents did not constitute a valid refund claim. Consequently, the grant of interest under Section 11BB was deemed not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1136 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner(Appeals) order and reinstating the original authority&#039;s decision of May 2005, denying the payment of interest on the pre-deposit. The Tribunal emphasized that no formal application for refund was made under Section 11B, and the submissions by the Respondents did not constitute a valid refund claim. Consequently, the grant of interest under Section 11BB was deemed not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>