<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 937 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing a specific disallowance related to unverifiable purchases and allowing the ground on late deposit of PF and ESI contributions. Other grounds, including the estimation of net profit and disallowance under Section 40(ia), were upheld with modifications. The appellant&#039;s grounds on the validity of the assessment order and allowance of depreciation were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 937 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing a specific disallowance related to unverifiable purchases and allowing the ground on late deposit of PF and ESI contributions. Other grounds, including the estimation of net profit and disallowance under Section 40(ia), were upheld with modifications. The appellant&#039;s grounds on the validity of the assessment order and allowance of depreciation were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>