<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1134 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the reversal of Cenvat credit due to manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products without maintaining separate accounts, as the respondents had already reversed the credit in compliance with the retrospective effect of the amendment. The case outcome confirmed the respondents&#039; actions were in line with the law, referencing a previous case for support.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1134 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the reversal of Cenvat credit due to manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products without maintaining separate accounts, as the respondents had already reversed the credit in compliance with the retrospective effect of the amendment. The case outcome confirmed the respondents&#039; actions were in line with the law, referencing a previous case for support.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>