https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209112 The appeal involved a re-rolling mill disputing duty liability under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The Assistant Commissioner confirmed a duty demand against the appellant for not discharging duty as per fixed capacity. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this order, based on the fixed production capacity. The appellant argued for duty demand based on revised capacity per Tribunal's Final Order. The Member (Technical) noted the initial demand was per Commissioner's order, later modified by Tribunal. The impugned order was set aside, remanding for re-quantification based on Tribunal's decision. Appeal disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209112 The appeal involved a re-rolling mill disputing duty liability under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The Assistant Commissioner confirmed a duty demand against the appellant for not discharging duty as per fixed capacity. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this order, based on the fixed production capacity. The appellant argued for duty demand based on revised capacity per Tribunal's Final Order. The Member (Technical) noted the initial demand was per Commissioner's order, later modified by Tribunal. The impugned order was set aside, remanding for re-quantification based on Tribunal's decision. Appeal disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209112