<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1120 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the delay in payment of service tax. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s reasons of financial problems were insufficient to warrant a waiver of the penalty, as valid reasons under Section 80 were not provided for the delay in discharging the service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1120 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the delay in payment of service tax. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s reasons of financial problems were insufficient to warrant a waiver of the penalty, as valid reasons under Section 80 were not provided for the delay in discharging the service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>