<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1008 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209106</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order due to jurisdictional issues and lack of consideration of the second charge. The case emphasized the complexities of valuing transformers under the Central Excise Tariff Act, stressing the importance of adherence to valuation rules and accounting standards to prevent disputes and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1008 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209106</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order due to jurisdictional issues and lack of consideration of the second charge. The case emphasized the complexities of valuing transformers under the Central Excise Tariff Act, stressing the importance of adherence to valuation rules and accounting standards to prevent disputes and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>