<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1007 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order due to non-compliance with Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act. The appellants were directed to deposit the required amount within eight weeks for the case to be heard on its merits. Failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1007 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order due to non-compliance with Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act. The appellants were directed to deposit the required amount within eight weeks for the case to be heard on its merits. Failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>