<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1089 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209071</link>
    <description>The appeals dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with the stay order and reduction of penalties were addressed. A duty of Rs.42,03,981/- was confirmed against M/s Falcon Submersibles Pvt. Ltd., with penalties imposed on its directors and partners. The Tribunal found the deposit made by M/s Falcon Submersibles Pvt. Ltd. sufficient for Section 35F purposes, dispensing the need for further pre-deposit and penalty imposition. The impugned order was set aside, and all appeals, including those of transporters linked to the main appeal, were remanded for a decision on merit without additional pre-deposit requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1089 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209071</link>
      <description>The appeals dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with the stay order and reduction of penalties were addressed. A duty of Rs.42,03,981/- was confirmed against M/s Falcon Submersibles Pvt. Ltd., with penalties imposed on its directors and partners. The Tribunal found the deposit made by M/s Falcon Submersibles Pvt. Ltd. sufficient for Section 35F purposes, dispensing the need for further pre-deposit and penalty imposition. The impugned order was set aside, and all appeals, including those of transporters linked to the main appeal, were remanded for a decision on merit without additional pre-deposit requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>