<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1078 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209060</link>
    <description>A separate declaration was not required to claim small scale exemption where the notification did not prescribe any specific pro forma. Filing the claim for the exemption notification itself was sufficient to intimate the Revenue of the assessee&#039;s option to avail the benefit. Earlier Tribunal decisions had already settled that no separate declaration was necessary for availing the exemption. Denial of the notification benefit solely for want of such a declaration was therefore unjustified, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1078 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209060</link>
      <description>A separate declaration was not required to claim small scale exemption where the notification did not prescribe any specific pro forma. Filing the claim for the exemption notification itself was sufficient to intimate the Revenue of the assessee&#039;s option to avail the benefit. Earlier Tribunal decisions had already settled that no separate declaration was necessary for availing the exemption. Denial of the notification benefit solely for want of such a declaration was therefore unjustified, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>