<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 987 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209051</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for a decision on the imposition of penalty under Rule 96ZQ(5). The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and previous orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 987 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209051</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for a decision on the imposition of penalty under Rule 96ZQ(5). The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and previous orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>